Why LNG Canada Flaring Is Way Worse Than the Permits Promised

Why LNG Canada Flaring Is Way Worse Than the Permits Promised

LNG Canada just hit a massive snag that nobody saw coming—or at least, nobody admitted was coming. If you live in Kitimat or follow the energy sector, you've probably seen the "Eye of Sauron" lighting up the B.C. sky. Those massive orange plumes aren't just for show. New documents obtained through Freedom of Information requests reveal that the facility has been flaring gas at rates that don't just "exceed" permits—they absolutely shatter them.

We’re talking about an average of 40 times the allowed volumes for certain flare types. In December 2025 alone, some flaring events were 60 times over the legal limit. This isn't a minor rounding error. It’s a systemic failure that the company now says might take three years to fully fix.

The Three Year Fix Nobody Wanted to Hear

The core of the problem is a persistent equipment defect. Specifically, it's an "integrity issue" with the flare stack. To keep the whole facility from quite literally exploding, LNG Canada has to route massive amounts of excess gas to the flares.

Think of it like a safety valve that’s stuck open because the pipe it’s attached to can't handle the pressure otherwise. Normally, the facility is supposed to burn about 11,000 cubic metres of gas a day during standard operations. Instead, they’ve been torching upwards of 170,000 to 205,000 cubic metres daily.

The kicker? Replacing the faulty "flare tip" isn't like swapping a lightbulb. Because of the complexity and the scale of the Kitimat plant, the company told regulators it could take until 2028 or 2029 to get the right parts integrated and the system running as intended. Until then, the "routine" flaring—which the company's own public notices ironically claim is "not expected to be routine"—will likely continue.

What’s Actually in That Smoke

When you see a flame 90 metres high—about the size of a 26-story building—it’s doing more than just making the sky glow. It’s releasing a cocktail of chemicals that have residents and health experts rightfully spooked.

  • Benzene: A known carcinogen. There is no "safe" level of exposure to this stuff.
  • Nitrogen Oxides (NOx): These irritate your lungs and can trigger asthma attacks on the spot.
  • Black Carbon: Basically soot. It’s bad for your lungs and even worse for the local snow and ice, which it darkens and melts faster.
  • VOCs: Volatile organic compounds that contribute to ground-level ozone.

The BC Energy Regulator ordered a third-party air quality study last year, which claimed there were "no measured adverse impacts." But local doctors and researchers like Dr. Laura Minet from the University of Victoria aren't buying the "everything is fine" narrative. They point out that monitoring stations are often far from the actual plumes, and short-term "spikes" in toxins can do damage even if the 24-hour average looks okay on paper.

The Startup Trap

There's a massive gap between what energy companies promise in their environmental assessments and what actually happens during "commissioning."

Most of these projects model their emissions based on a perfectly running plant. But as we’re seeing with LNG Canada’s Train 1 and Train 2, the startup phase is messy. A recent study co-funded by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council found that LNG plants flare about three times more gas during startup than during regular operations. In Kitimat’s case, it’s been much higher than that.

The regulators seem to have been caught off guard, or they’re just being incredibly lenient. Despite six months of "self-disclosed" non-compliance, no fines have been issued. The regulator basically said, "Keep us posted," while the company continues to burn off gas volumes that would be unthinkable under their original permits.

Noise and Vibrations

It’s not just the light and the chemicals. Residents in Strawberry Meadows and Kitamaat Village have been complaining about low-frequency vibrations and a sound like a "jet engine" idling in their backyard.

The company finally admitted this noise was tied to "cold dry flaring"—a process where unlit gas is moved through the system without enough "assist gas" to keep it quiet. They’ve tried to dampen the sound by importing nitrogen and changing how they cool the pipes, but for many, the damage to their peace of mind is already done.

Reality Check for Future Projects

If you're looking at other proposed projects like Woodfibre LNG or Cedar LNG, what’s happening in Kitimat is a loud warning. The "cleanest LNG in the world" tag looks a lot different when you’re staring at a 90-metre flame that’s been burning for months because of a design flaw.

You can't just trust the environmental assessment's "best-case scenario." If you're a local resident or an investor, you need to be asking about the "worst-case" commissioning phase.

Next Steps for Residents and Observers:

  1. Track the Data: Don't just rely on the company's Facebook updates. Check the BC Energy Regulator's public portal for actual emission exceedance reports.
  2. Report Symptoms: If you’re feeling respiratory issues during heavy flaring, get it on the medical record. Anecdotes don't change policy, but documented health Trends do.
  3. Demand Real-Time Monitoring: Push for air quality monitors that are placed in the direct path of the prevailing winds from the flare stacks, not just at the recreation centre.

The "Eye of Sauron" isn't going away anytime soon. If the three-year timeline holds, Kitimat is in for a very long, very bright, and very smoky transition to "steady-state" production.

MJ

Matthew Jones

Matthew Jones is an award-winning writer whose work has appeared in leading publications. Specializes in data-driven journalism and investigative reporting.